il-002820-9932929394904146-990004740500304146
type: RecordSet
physical characteristics and technical requirements: Mode of access: WWW
conditions of access: Access may be restricted to TAU community via Automatic Proxy
has or had holder: il-002820
has or had some members with language: deu
identifier: 990004740500304146
is or was included in: il-002820-9932929394904146
note: Electronic text and image data. Tel Aviv : Tel Aviv University. Wiener Library 2017
note: Title viewed 16.03.2017
note: Also available in microfilm: Der Berner Prozess um die"Protokolle der Weisen von Zio" ...Strafsache Schweizerischer israelitischer Gemeindebund und Israelitische Kultusgemeinde Bern gegen die Gauleitung des Bundes national-sozialisticher Eidgenossen und weitere Angeschuldigte ...; Frame 2162;
record resource extent: 1 online resource (1 page)
scope and content: The author of this document refutes Fleischhauer's claim that Nicholas I was poisoned by a Jew, by citing Nikolai Evgenevich Markov's article published in the antisemitic newspaper Novoie Wremia on the 18th of February 1923. The article is entitled as 'Ist das ein Rätsel?' (Is this a mystery?) in which N. Markow explains that he is in possession of all manuscripts of the Czar since 1870. After the defeat of the Russian army in the Crimean War in 1855, Czar Nicholas I was unable to live with the shame and decided to commit suicide. He asked his doctor for poison. The doctor did not dare to disobey and gave him the poison. At his deathbed, the Czar explained to his son Alexander II that his doctor was not a Jew. Also the claim that Alexander III had been poisoned by his doctor is wrong. Although his doctor was a Jew, nobody, not even the anti-Semites, has ever claimed that he killed the Czar. This claim only came up as part of the propaganda after the revolution. Ist das ein Rätsel Markov, N. E. Nowoje Wremja
title: Vergiftung des Zaren Nikolaus I.