@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix ehri: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix rico: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a ehri:RecordSet ;
rdfs:seeAlso ;
ehri:notes "Title viewed 18.02.2019"@en , "Electronic access only"@en , "Electronic text and image data Jerusalem Yad Vashem 2015"@en ;
ehri:physicalCharacterisiticsAndTechnicalRequirements
"Mode of Access : WWW"@en ;
rico:conditionsOfAccess "Access may be restricted to TAU community via Automatic Proxy"@en ;
rico:hasBeginningDate ;
rico:hasEndDate ;
rico:hasOrHadHolder ;
rico:hasOrHadSomeMembersWithLanguage
;
rico:identifier "9932948674104146"^^xsd:decimal ;
rico:isOrWasIncludedIn ;
rico:recordResourceExtent "2 electronic resources (65 pages)"@en ;
rico:scopeAndContent "The file contains documents regarding the Bern trial. The documents include expert reports by Arthur Baumgarten, by Prof. Dr. Ludwig, by Flauschhauer and one which is not labeled with a name. Ludwig's report deals with the work\"The Talmud Hungaria\", published by Alfons Luzsensky. Ludwig was asked to answer two questions regarding\"The Talmud Hungaria\" respective the Bern trial. Baumgarten's report deals with the authenticity of the 'Protocols', which he dubbed a fake. The third report deals with the question of whether the criminal complaint of the offense against the 'Schundliteratur' (trash literature) is lawful. The opinion of Fleischhauer is briefly outlined and then criticized. For example, his wrong citation in which he cautiously tore quotes out of context or half-rendered them."@en ;
rico:title "Gutachten"@en .