@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix ehri: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix rico: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a ehri:RecordSet ;
rdfs:seeAlso ;
ehri:notes "Electronic text and image data. Jerusalem : Yad Vashem 2015"@en , "Electronic access only"@en , "Title viewed 21.6.2018"@en , "Handwritten notes, expertise"@en ;
ehri:physicalCharacterisiticsAndTechnicalRequirements
"Mode of access: WWW"@en ;
rico:conditionsOfAccess "Access may be restricted to TAU community via Automatic Proxy"@en ;
rico:hasBeginningDate ;
rico:hasEndDate ;
rico:hasOrHadHolder ;
rico:hasOrHadSomeMembersWithLanguage
;
rico:identifier "990004850350304146"^^xsd:decimal ;
rico:isOrWasIncludedIn ;
rico:recordResourceExtent "1 electronic resource (272 pages)"@en ;
rico:scopeAndContent "The file contains a statement on the expertise of Prof. A. Baumgarten regarding the Bern trial and the authenticity of the 'Protocols of the Wise man of Zion'. The statement is including an index concerning the 'main wittnesses for the forgery of the 'Protocols', informations about Joly, the 'Protocols and the Freemasons', the 'Protocols and the Progroms', informations about the Talmud and a conclusion. The author questions Baumgartens expertise and explains a different opinion and approach. In several footnotes the author discribes why he thinks that Baumgartens demonstrations were wrong, why he and Loosli made mistakes and why Fleischhauers expertise was more accurate. Furthermore he says that Fleischhauer was not able to get the same informations as the other experts denied him the access. He also critically overviewed the references Baumgarten was using, as well as his working methods and interrogated wittnesses, which he comments in the footnotes. He further campares the expertises of Loosli and Fleischhauer with Baumgartens. At the end of his statement he also makes comments on his footnotes including a register of persons. On some pages handwritten notes can be seen."@en ;
rico:title "Stellungnahme zum Gutachten des Professors A. Baumgarten im Berner Prozesse"@en .