@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix ehri: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix rico: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a ehri:RecordSet ;
rdfs:seeAlso ;
ehri:notes "Electronic access only"@en , "letters, Interview and reports"@en , "Electronic text and image data. Jerusalem : Yad Vashem 2015"@en , "Title viewed 15.5.2018"@en ;
ehri:physicalCharacterisiticsAndTechnicalRequirements
"Mode of access: WWW"@en ;
rico:conditionsOfAccess "Access may be restricted to TAU community via Aut omatic Proxy"@en ;
rico:hasBeginningDate ;
rico:hasEndDate ;
rico:hasOrHadHolder ;
rico:hasOrHadSomeMembersWithLanguage
;
rico:identifier "990004841000304146"^^xsd:decimal ;
rico:isOrWasIncludedIn ;
rico:recordResourceExtent "1 electronic resource (73 pages)"@en ;
rico:scopeAndContent "The file contains correspondences between Ulrich Fleischhauer, expert named by the defendant and Hans Ruef, the lawyer of Silvio Schnell, who was a a member of the National Front and responsible for their distribution of writings, and further with the Police direction of Bern, Switzerland and the court. The correspondence is regarding some disagreements between Fleischhauer and the court, as he claims refund for his work on the expert opinion and report for the Bern trial. He calculated 65166,44 RM for his work. Also Ruef tried to help in this matter, as Fleischhauer spent aparently a lot of his own money for the report. As it is written the other experts honorariums have been paid, so the question have been raised why Fleischhauer did not reseive his refund. Additional letters of complains regarding the refund are attached. Further disagreements between Fleischhauer and others can be seen. Other participants and assistants, like Oberst Haller and DR. Meyer, also claimed their experts honorariums for the Bern trail."@en ;
rico:title "[Correspondence regarding assumption of material costs from the Bern trial]"@en .