@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix ehri: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix rico: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a ehri:RecordSet ;
rdfs:seeAlso ;
ehri:notes "Title viewed 13.5.2018"@en , "Electronic text and image data. Jerusalem : Yad Vashem 2015"@en , "Electronic access only"@en ;
ehri:physicalCharacterisiticsAndTechnicalRequirements
"Mode of access: WWW"@en ;
rico:conditionsOfAccess "Access may be restricted to TAU community via Aut omatic Proxy"@en ;
rico:hasBeginningDate ;
rico:hasEndDate ;
rico:hasOrHadHolder ;
rico:hasOrHadSomeMembersWithLanguage
;
rico:identifier "990004840050304146"^^xsd:decimal ;
rico:isOrWasIncludedIn ;
rico:recordResourceExtent "1 electronic resource (104 pages)"@en ;
rico:scopeAndContent "The file contains an expertise regarding the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'. The expertise starts with a short summary of the 'Protocols', as the Bern criminal court wanted the nominated experts to answer some questions regarding the Protocols. The questions which had to be answered were: 'Was the Protocols of the Elders of Zion a forgery? Was it plagiarized? If it was, what was its source? Do the Protocols fall under the term Schundliteratur?' So to understand the expertise and to be able to answer the questions from the court the structure and the main ideas of the 'Protocols' have been centralized. Baumgarten declared the 'Protocols' as a plagiarism and a forgery produced by helpers of the tsarist Russian Okhrana. The connection between the 'Freumaurer' (Freemason) and the 'Protocols', as well as the not mention of Zionism are arguments, among others, against the authenticity. On 119 pages Prof. Baumgarten explains in detail his expert opinion. In his conclusion he explains that the presented plans of an alleged existing Jewish secret government have nothing to do with the cultural, political and economic goals of Judaism."@en ;
rico:title "Gutachten"@en .