[<> Bern Trial - Court Session Protocols]

[<> Bern Trial - Court Session Protocols] 

[<> Bern Trial - Court Session Protocols] 

1 electronic resource (84 pages) 

The Bern Trial. Protocol of the Session in the morning of October 30, 1934. Hearing of the witness Sliosberg who tells the court that he first saw the protocolls in 1900 and describes it as a ridiculous forgery created to cause unrest not only against the Jews but also against democratic and liberal forces in Russia. He describes the history of origin as forged by the Russian secret police in France influenced by the Dreyfuss trial. He describes how the protocolls were first published as part of a book of Nilus. Sliosberg decribes Ratschovsky of the Russian Secret Police in France as dangerous and the key person. He describes the antisemitism of Russian expats who connected with German nationalists. He explains why the antisemitic conpiracy of the protocols must have developed in France and not in Russia where most of the Jews were poor. Sliosberg decribes Alexander III as a genuine Antisemite who introduced antisemitism into bureaucracy. Hearing of the witness Ebert who was a delegate to the WJC in 1897 and describes the discussions that took place. He strongly denies the possibility of a secret resolution for the Jewish World Domination. Hearing of the witness Miljukow who confirms the antisemitism of the Russian czarist government. Miljukow also explains that 40% of the protocolls are copied from Jolly's Dialogues. He explaines that the Jewish community was confronted with the accusations of world domination that were later published in the protocolls. Hearing of the witness Ehrenpreis who was a delegate to the WTC in 1897 and deems it impossible that there were secret talks to conclude the World Domination. Ehrenpreis explains in detail that the Jewish theology isn't about World Domination at all. Hearing of the witness Farbstein also delegate to the WJC in 1897. Farbstein also denies the possibility of secret talks about the World Domination.